RISMEDIA, July 29, 2010—The Obama Administration recently announced expanded opportunities for public engagement on the future of our nation’s housing finance system, including Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. These events, which will include a major conference in Washington, D.C., will help provide critical public input as the Administration continues its work developing a comprehensive housing finance reform proposal for delivery to Congress by January 2011.

“The future of our housing finance system is critical not only to our economic recovery, but also to millions of American homeowners in every corner of our country,” said Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner. “Now is the time to build on the foundation we laid with the historic Wall Street Reform legislation President Obama signed recently and aggressively move forward to improve our nation’s housing finance system. The Obama Administration is committed to delivering a comprehensive reform proposal that protects taxpayers, institutes tough oversight, restores the long-term health of our housing market and strengthens our nation’s economic recovery.”

“The Obama Administration is committed to engaging stakeholders and the public as we consider proposals for reforming the housing finance system,” said U.S. Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan. “The need for reform is clear and we want to listen to a wide range of views as we chart a course to a more robust and stable housing market that works for the benefit of the American people.”

In the months ahead, the Administration will continue to gather input from a broad cross-section of stakeholders through a variety of events. On August 17, 2010, the Obama Administration will host a Conference on the Future of Housing Finance in Washington D.C. at the Treasury Department. This event will bring together leading academic experts, consumer and community organizations, industry groups, market participants and other stakeholders for an open discussion about housing finance reform.

The Obama Administration has already begun the work of developing proposals for reforming our nation’s system of housing finance. In early 2010, Secretaries Geithner and Donovan delivered testimony before Congress on the Obama Administration’s ongoing work in this area and the broad principles that would guide those efforts.

In April 2010, Treasury and HUD issued a set of questions for public comment on the future of the housing finance system, which received more than 300 responses from a broad cross-section of consumer groups, industry groups, market participants, members of the public, think tanks and other stakeholders. These responses will help provide additional input and perspective as the Obama Administration moves forward to develop its comprehensive reform proposal.

For more information, visit www.hud.gov.

RISMedia welcomes your questions and comments. Send your e-mail to: realestatemagazinefeedback@rismedia.com.

Copyright© 2010 RISMedia, The Leader in Real Estate Information Systems and Real Estate News. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be republished without permission from RISMedia.

View full post on RISMedia » Consumer News and Advice

RISMEDIA, July 30, 2010—A wide array of organizations including the American Land Title Association, the National Association of Realtors, AFSCME, Vote Vets, the Center for Responsible Lending, the Property Rights Alliance and the Institute for Liberty recently launched The Coalition to Stop Wall Street Home Resale Fees with an appeal to United States Secretary of the Treasury Timothy Geithner to ban dangerous Wall Street Home Resale Fees (also known as “private transfer fee covenants”), which have already been restricted in 17 states because of their adverse impact on homeowners and home buyers.

Members of the Coalition delivered a letter to Secretary Geithner and representatives at the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Federal Housing Finance Agency, Federal Trade Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission, Farm Credit Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs, Federal Reserve Board, Deferral Deposit Insurance Corporation, National Credit Union Administration and Office of Thrift Supervision, declaring their opposition to Wall Street Home Resale Fees and calling on the Obama Administration to ban their use.

“This dangerous new fee is a prime example of Wall Street investors trying to profit from unsuspecting homeowners,” said Kurt Pfotenhauer, President of the American Land Title Association. “We’re asking Secretary Geithner to stand up for Main Street homeowners and buyers and stop the use of Wall Street Home Resale Fees today.”

Manhattan-based Freehold Capitol Partners is leading the push to add these fees to home purchase contracts. The fees require that a percentage of the final sale price of a home be paid to a private third party every time the property is sold, typically for 99 years. Freehold is attempting to then sell the right to collect these fees on Wall Street.

“As the leading advocate for homeownership and housing issues, the National Association of Realtors strongly opposes home resale fees, or private transfer fees,” said Lucien Salvant, Managing Director for Public Affairs at the National Association of Realtors. “They add an unnecessary and unfair burden to the real estate transaction for either buyer or seller.”

The Coalition to Stop Wall Street Home Resale Fees has already been active, raising awareness about the issue and taking action to stop these dangerous fees.

To date, 17 state legislatures in Arizona, California, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Texas and Utah have recognized the dangers of Wall Street Home Resale Fees and have restricted their use.

An official with the U.S. Federal Housing Administration confirmed that the government will not insure mortgages for properties with Wall Street Home Resale Fees and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development confirmed these fees violate HUD’s regulations.

“At a time when state and local governments are cutting services to the bone, it makes no sense to force them to use tax-payer dollars to dole out unearned profits to Wall Street,” said AFSCME President Gerald W. McEntee. “This financial scheme is a pipedream for Wall Street and a nightmare for everyone else.”

“Owning a home has always been part of the American dream—for veterans and non-vets alike,” said Jon Soltz, Co-Founder and Chair of Vote Vets. “We fought to preserve the American dream for all, but these greedy Wall Street Home Resale Fees mislead homeowners and make that dream more difficult to attain.”

“This country has seen enough abusive financial practices to last a lifetime,” said Uriah King, Vice President of State Policy at the Center for Responsible Lending. “Now, yet again, homeownership and family wealth are at risk because of Wall Street’s unscrupulous practices.”

“One had thought that the concept of serfdom had been abolished centuries ago, but Wall Street is trying to re-introduce the concept through these near-perpetual fees,” said Andrew Langer, President of the Institute for Liberty. “When I own my home “free and clear” it means that I have the right to keep any profits through its sale. This practice forces a landowner into a third-party’s fiefdom, watering down individual rights in the process.”

The Coalition to Stop Wall Street Home Resale Fees has organized to fight the dangerous financial scheme of transfer fee covenants and to protect homeowners across the country.

For more information, visit http://www.stophomeresalefees.org.

RISMedia welcomes your questions and comments. Send your e-mail to: realestatemagazinefeedback@rismedia.com.

Copyright© 2010 RISMedia, The Leader in Real Estate Information Systems and Real Estate News. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be republished without permission from RISMedia.

View full post on RISMedia » Consumer News and Advice

RISMEDIA, July 30, 2010—RealtyTrac, a leading online marketplace for foreclosure properties released its Midyear 2010 Metropolitan Foreclosure Market Report, which shows 154 of the 206 U.S. metropolitan areas with a population of 200,000 or more posted year-over-year increases in foreclosure activity even while foreclosure activity decreased in nine of the 10 metros with the highest foreclosure rates.

Four states—Florida, California, Nevada and Arizona—accounted for all top 20 metro foreclosure rates. Florida led the way, with nine of the top 20 metro foreclosure rates, followed by California with eight, Nevada with two and Arizona with one.

“While we’re seeing early signs that foreclosure activity may have peaked in some of the hardest-hit markets, foreclosures continued to rise in three-quarters of the nation’s metropolitan areas in the first half of the year,” said James J. Saccacio, chief executive officer of RealtyTrac. “The fragile stability achieved in many local housing markets hinges on improvements in the underlying economy, specifically job growth. If unemployment remains persistently high and foreclosure prevention efforts only delay the inevitable, then we could continue to see increased foreclosure activity and a corresponding weakness in home prices in many metro areas.”

Top 10 metro foreclosure rates
Las Vegas continued to post the nation’s highest metro foreclosure rate in the first half of the year, with 6.60% of its housing units (one in 15) receiving a foreclosure filing—more than five times the national average. A total of 53,525 Las Vegas properties received a foreclosure filing during the six-month period, a decrease of nearly 15% from the previous six months and a decrease of nearly 9% from the first half of 2009.

Foreclosure activity in the Cape Coral-Fort Myers, Fla., metro area decreased nearly 22% from the previous six months and was down nearly 30% from the first half of 2009, but the metro area still documented the nation’s second highest metro foreclosure rate—4.98% of its housing units (one in 20) received a foreclosure filing during the six-month period. Other Florida cities in the top 10 were Orlando-Kissimmee at No. 8 (4.15% of housing units) and Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach at No. 10 (3.89%).

With 4.59% of its housing units (one in 22) receiving a foreclosure filing, Modesto, Calif., posted the nation’s third highest metro foreclosure rate. Other California cities in the top 10 were Merced at No. 4 (4.47% of housing units); Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario at No. 5 (4.37%); Stockton at No. 6 (4.37%); and Vallejo-Fairfield at No. 9 (3.91%).

The Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale metro area in Arizona posted the nation’s seventh highest metro foreclosure rate, with 4.28% of its housing units (one in 23) receiving a foreclosure filing in the first half of 2010.

Metros with highest foreclosure totals
More properties received a foreclosure filing in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach metro area during the first half of 2010 than any other metro area with a population of 200,000 or more. A total of 94,466 properties in the Miami area received a foreclosure filing during the six-month period, a decrease of 8% from the previous six months, but up nearly 11% from the first six months of 2009.

A total of 93,263 properties in the Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana metro area received a foreclosure filing in the first half of 2010, the second highest total of any metro area nationwide and 2.11% of all housing units (one in 47)—ranking No. 35 in terms of foreclosure rate.

A total of 78,022 properties in the Chicago-Naperville-Joliet metro area received a foreclosure filing in the first half of 2010, the third highest total and 2.07% of all housing units (one in 48)—ranking No. 37 in terms of foreclosure rate.

Other metro areas with the 10 highest foreclosure totals were Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale (73,352), Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario (63,717), Las Vegas-Paradise (53,525), Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta (52,381), Detroit-Warren-Livonia (47,563), New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island (44,522) and Orlando-Kissimmee (37,352).

For more information, visit www.realtytrac.com.

RISMedia welcomes your questions and comments. Send your e-mail to: realestatemagazinefeedback@rismedia.com.

Copyright© 2010 RISMedia, The Leader in Real Estate Information Systems and Real Estate News. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be republished without permission from RISMedia.

View full post on RISMedia » Consumer News and Advice

RISMEDIA, July 29, 2010—After getting the keys to their new homes, many first-time home buyers are excited about finally having the opportunity to personalize and furnish their new house. From coffee tables to lamps to lawnmowers, many previous renters leap into homeownership quickly realizing they need to do a lot of shopping to truly make their house a home.

“Whether you’ve been living in an apartment with roommates or at your parents’ house, many first-time home buyers do not think about all the items they need – and want – when moving into a house,” said Janice Jones, national vice president of merchandising for Centex. “With a little advance planning and budgeting, you won’t break the bank to make your new home a reflection of your personal style and showcase your pride of homeownership.”

A typical home buyer spends $7,400 on average on their home, with more than half of that spent in the first year after purchase, according to the National Association of Home Builders.

While many first-time home buyers may not have accounted for this level of spending, Jones offers advice on what types of items to purchase to not only properly maintain and live in the home, but also more importantly, items that help new homeowners feel like their house is a place to call home.

Furnishings
Many first-time home buyers no longer want their parents’ hand-me downs or their childhood bedroom set. From sofas to dining room sets to mattresses, many first-time home buyers take the opportunity to upgrade their furniture when moving into their new home. According to an NAHB study, furnishings take the biggest chunk of the budget, with home buyers spending about $5,300 on furnishings during the first year after buying a home. The biggest ticket item for all households is bedroom furnishings, including mattresses, followed by sofas.

Window coverings and linens
The median square footage of homes bought by first-time buyers is 1,500. So, you can only imagine the number of windows that need to be covered to ensure privacy and security in a home. According to Jones, many home buyers don’t account for this in their budget. Additionally, with the ability to now paint and decorate each room, new homeowners find that they want to purchase new bedroom and bathroom linens.

Garden tools
Since a first-time home buyer is likely to move into their home from an apartment, unless you plan on hiring a gardener, you’ll need to purchase a few basic gardening tools, including a lawnmower, garden hose, sprinkler and a shovel (for winter weather).

Flat screen TV
Let’s face it: many home buyers shop for their new home while taking into a consideration how a new, large, flat-screen television set will be situated in their new living space. So, it’s not a surprise that a hot item on the list is purchasing an entertainment system.

However, you’ll also need the basic appliances in your new home: a refrigerator, stove, and a washer/dryer. While many existing homes usually come with appliances, a home buyer needs to take inventory as to whether or not they will need to purchase these big ticket items before they purchase their new bedroom set.

Basic tool kit
Every home needs a well-stocked tool box. Many home improvement stores have sets you can purchase, but make sure it includes a hammer, screw drivers, pliers, wrenches, a tape measure and a staple gun.

“My biggest piece of advice for new home buyers is to be creative and tackle this room by room,” said Jones. “For example, after outfitting your home with the necessary items—like appliances and window coverings—move on to the kitchen and family room spaces. This area is the heart of your home where everyone gathers.

“Look for great values on the items you need that will be utilized most. Take your time and get the feel of how you want to use each space for both function and enjoyment. This strategy allows homeowners to stage their purchases and add new furnishings as the budget allows. Decorating your new home should be fun and a reflection of your personal style.”

For more information, visit www.centex.com.

RISMedia welcomes your questions and comments. Send your e-mail to: realestatemagazinefeedback@rismedia.com.

Copyright© 2010 RISMedia, The Leader in Real Estate Information Systems and Real Estate News. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be republished without permission from RISMedia.

View full post on RISMedia » Consumer News and Advice

RISMEDIA, July 29, 2010—Reflective of the real estate buyers’ market conditions in many regions in the U.S., satisfaction with real estate companies among home buyers has improved from 2009, while satisfaction among home sellers has declined, according to the J.D. Power and Associates 2010 Home Buyer/Seller Study.

The study, now in its third year, measures customer satisfaction of home buyers and sellers with the largest national real estate companies. Overall satisfaction is determined by examining three factors for the home-buying experience: agent/salesperson; office; and variety of additional services. Four factors are examined for the home-selling experience: agent/salesperson; marketing; office; and variety of additional services.

Overall satisfaction among home buyers averages 803 on a 1,000-point scale in 2010—increasing by 12 points from 2009. This improvement is primarily driven by increased satisfaction with agents and salespersons. In contrast, overall satisfaction among home sellers has declined by 40 points from 2009 and averages 742 in 2010. Among home sellers, satisfaction has decreased in all four factors, with the largest declines observed in marketing of the home and the variety of additional services offered.

“Among both home buyers and home sellers, the importance of agents and salespersons has increased substantially in 2010, compared with 2009,” said Jim Howland, senior director of the real estate and construction practice at J.D. Power and Associates. “Buyers are increasingly relying upon negotiating skills of agents and seem to be satisfied with the purchase prices they are obtaining. Despite the fact that selling agents appear to be doing a good job of negotiating and marketing on behalf of home sellers, the tough economic conditions are negatively impacting their overall satisfaction with real estate companies.”

In the home-buyer segment, Keller Williams ranks highest for a third consecutive year, with a score of 817 on a 1,000-point scale. Keller Williams performs particularly well in the agent and office factors. Following in the rankings are Prudential (811) and Coldwell Banker (805). Prudential performs well in the additional services category.

Among home sellers, Prudential ranks highest with a score of 760 and performs particularly well in the marketing and agent factors. Prudential is the only company to improve in home-seller satisfaction in 2010, compared with 2009. Following Prudential in the rankings are Keller Williams (751) and RE/MAX (744). Keller Williams performs particularly well in the office factor.

The study finds that fewer than one-half of home buyers and sellers indicate their agent asked them to provide a referral or recommendation to a friend or family member.

“Positive recommendations are a critically important driver of new business for agents, and there is ample opportunity for improvement in this area,” said Howland. “Particularly during tough times in the real estate market, asking for referrals and recommendations should be considered an essential part of doing business.”

J.D. Power and Associates offers the following tips to consumers who are buying or selling a home:

- Finding the right agent to suit your specific needs is critical. J.D. Power research has consistently demonstrated that having the right agent is critical to a satisfying home-buying or -selling experience. Due to the unique nature of real estate transactions, clients often form bonds with their agents, as a single buying or selling transaction can take several months or more to complete. For customers who have previously bought or sold a home, the right agent might be someone they’ve worked with successfully in the past. For first-time buyers, seeking recommendations from friends, relatives and colleagues is critical. Increasingly, agents and brokers are advertising their services on the Internet, so this can be a good starting point for research, particularly for someone moving far away from their current location.

- In addition to a buying or selling agent, consider the additional services you may require. Buying and selling a home is a complex undertaking with many “moving parts” to consider. In addition to the real estate agent you work with, you may also need to work with a loan officer, a financial institution, title/escrow company, inspectors, appraisers, home warranty agents, movers, storage services, contractors, etc. One of the advantages of using a full-service real estate company is that they can assist with finding and coordinating some of these necessary additional services.

- For sellers, marketing one’s home should be a primary focus. In addition to finding the right agent, home sellers should pay special attention to tools used to market the home. When selecting an agent, find out their approach to open houses and online marketing, in particular. J.D. Power research finds that home buyers often search for homes online long before they engage a buying agent, or even attend an open house. Ask about which websites will contain the home listing, the number of home photos that can be included and if any special features will accompany the listing, such as virtual tours or mortgage calculators. Tools that assist prospective home buyers may help attract attention to the listing.

- For buyers, it’s important to understand the full cost of the home prior to making a purchase. It’s prudent for home buyers to establish a housing budget and to expect agents to show homes in the appropriate price range. Particularly for first-time buyers, it’s important to understand all the associated fees and expenses that go along with purchasing a particular home. These can include one-time expenses, such as ‘points’ that lower mortgage rates, title fees and appraisals, as well as ongoing expenses such as homeowners association fees, property taxes, or other specialized local taxes that can impact your monthly payments.

For more information, visit www.jdpower.com.

RISMedia welcomes your questions and comments. Send your e-mail to: realestatemagazinefeedback@rismedia.com.

Copyright© 2010 RISMedia, The Leader in Real Estate Information Systems and Real Estate News. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be republished without permission from RISMedia.

View full post on RISMedia » Consumer News and Advice